R+2 standards submissions · public accountability

Global

Every standards-body submission for the R+2 Open Provenance Standard, with public status. Updated as responses arrive. We publish this because open standards work in the open.

Updated manually as status changes · last refreshed May 19, 2026

Day-0 submissions

Queued for Day +3 to +30

Acknowledged

Substantive response

Cited in regulator doc

day 0 — May 22, 2026 (planned)

Initial three submissions

Region	Target	Submitted	Status	Notes
🇺🇸 US — AI lab	Anthropic Standards Program[email protected]	May 22, 2026	QUEUED	Submitted via standards mailbox; framing emphasizes MCP composition
🇮🇳 India — Government	Ministry of Electronics & IT (MeitY)AI Standards Committee	May 22, 2026	QUEUED	Includes r2-gov-v1 sectoral profile mapped to DPDP §8/9/11/22
🇮🇳 India — Space	ISRO AI Working GroupDepartment of Space, Bengaluru	May 22, 2026	QUEUED	Sovereign-deployment framing; F9 + F19 satellite-provenance bears

Days +3 to +30 — global expansion (queued)

Seven additional regional submissions

The R+2 standard is global by design. These submissions roll out over 30 days post-launch, one regulator per region.

Region	Target	Planned	Status	Notes
🇺🇸 US — Government	NIST AI Risk Management Framework+ AI Safety Institute (AISI)	May 25, 2026	QUEUED	AI RMF alignment + future FedRAMP path
🇪🇺 EU — AI Act	European AI Office+ ISO/IEC JTC1 SC42 (ISO 42001)	May 27, 2026	QUEUED	EU AI Act Art. 12 (logging) + Art. 14 (oversight) alignment
🇬🇧 UK — AI Safety	UK AI Safety Institute (AISI)	May 29, 2026	QUEUED	Cross-vendor audit framework angle
🇯🇵 Japan	METI AI Office+ Japan AI Safety Institute	June 1, 2026	QUEUED	Society 5.0 + METI AI Guidelines alignment
🇦🇪 UAE — Home market	UAE Data Office+ Dubai Smart Government	June 5, 2026	QUEUED	UAE AI Strategy 2031 + PDPL alignment · home jurisdiction
🇰🇷 South Korea	Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC)	June 9, 2026	QUEUED	AI Basic Act (2023) + PIPA alignment
🇦🇺 Australia	Department of IndustryAI Ethics Framework body	June 16, 2026	QUEUED	National AI Centre engagement
🇨🇦 Canada	Office of the Privacy Commissioner+ ISED AI policy	June 21, 2026	QUEUED	PIPEDA + Bill C-27 AIDA alignment

Why phased, not all at once. Each submission gets a region-specific framing letter, not a copy-paste. Submitting all 10 on Day 0 dilutes attention and reads as cold-blast. Sequencing creates a steady cadence — each new submission is a small public update + tweet thread. Steady momentum > single blast.

commitments

Public accountability promises

1. We publish every submission — including the ones that don't reply, on this page, with date sent.

2. We don't claim endorsement we don't have. A "submitted" status means we sent it; nothing more. "Cited" requires a published regulator document referencing R+2 by name.

3. We update status changes within 7 days of receiving them. Acknowledgments, reviews, responses — all appear here.

4. We don't shame regulators for slow responses. Standards work moves at standards-work pace. A blank "no response" status is normal for the first 60-120 days.

5. This page exists permanently. Submissions that get rejected stay listed with that status. Open standards work in the open, including the failures.

Read the standard yourself

Every claim on this page is grounded in the actual standard. You can read it, run the reference verifier, and audit our work without our cooperation.

For regulators reading this page: If you're at a standards body or government AI office considering R+2 — write to us directly at [email protected]. We will respond within 5 business days. We can present at working groups in person if you're in Dubai, virtually elsewhere.

Popular

Compute & Infrastructure

Build & Agents

AI & Workspace

Trust & Verification

DCS AI Technologies

DCS Labs Research

Developers

Solutions

Company

Status & trust